Saved ✓
← All Tools
STSHC v1.0 · ACI Calibration · Lightweight
Quick Weight
Calibrator

A 6-question team calibration tool for deriving locally relevant ACI weights without a full Delphi panel process. Designed for teams of 5–20 people who need more than a preset but less than a formal consensus exercise.

STSHC_QUICK_CALIBRATOR_v1.0 Teams of 5–20 ~10 minutes
Mandatory Regulatory Boundary & Operational Disclaimer

This tool produces directional ACI weight estimates for voluntary, non-diagnostic planning purposes only. Weights derived here are less rigorously calibrated than those produced by the full Delphi process (Appendix A, White Paper v1.0). All outputs are planning heuristics — not validated psychometric measurements. Must never be used for employment, disciplinary, or performance management decisions.

Use this tool when: Your team context doesn't fit Knowledge Work, Caregiving, or Creative presets — but you can't realistically convene a 5–10 person panel for a full two-round Delphi process. A team lead, HR manager, or operations lead can complete this alone in 10 minutes. The output is a locally informed starting weight set that can be refined over time.

Use the full Delphi Tool when: You are making a significant organizational commitment to ACI deployment, have 5+ stakeholders with diverse roles who can participate, and want the rigorous consensus process that produces defensible, panel-validated weights.
For each of the six ACI pillars, rate how important that capacity dimension is to your team's effective functioning on a scale of 1 (minimal importance) to 5 (critical importance). Answer based on what your team actually needs to perform well — not what sounds right in theory.
Pillar 1 · Biological Capacity
MEI — Metabolic Energy Index

How important is baseline physical energy availability to your team's daily output? Consider: does physical fatigue meaningfully affect performance in your team's primary work? Are physical demands — travel, long hours, physical activity — a regular feature of the role?

Not critical
Critical
Pillar 2 · Psychological Capacity
ASI — Autonomic Safety Index

How important is psychological safety and low threat-monitoring to your team's performance? Consider: does your team do high-stakes, high-visibility work where perceived environmental safety affects quality? Is relational stress or organizational tension a regular performance variable?

Not critical
Critical
Pillar 3 · Cognitive Capacity
PRS — Pre-Task Readiness Scale

How dependent is your team's output on sustained attentional clarity and low cognitive friction? Consider: does your team do complex synthesis, problem-solving, or creative work where attention quality directly determines output quality?

Not critical
Critical
Pillar 4 · Meaning Capacity
MAV — Meaning Alignment Variable

How much does value alignment and a sense of purpose affect your team's engagement and output quality? Consider: does your team do mission-driven, creative, or meaning-sensitive work where intrinsic motivation is a primary performance driver?

Not critical
Critical
Pillar 5 · Relational Capacity
RCI — Relational Capacity Index

How important is the quality of relational support and team cohesion to your team's functioning? Consider: is your team's work highly collaborative, client-facing, or dependent on trust relationships? Does relational friction or isolation measurably reduce performance?

Not critical
Critical
Pillar 6 · Regenerative Capacity
RCV — Regenerative Capacity Variable

How important is recovery, renewal, and regenerative capacity to sustaining your team's output over time? Consider: does your team do high-intensity, high-frequency output work where burnout risk is real? Does novelty, creative replenishment, or recovery time measurably affect output cycles?

Not critical
Critical
Rate all six pillars above to generate your calibrated weight profile.